Smiths Outline Bible Project

Read or search the Bible (opens new tab)

Theological Outline of 2 Chronicles 28

Introduction:  2 Chronicles 28 offers a compelling narrative of power, specifically examining how it is wielded, the consequences of its misuse, and ultimately, God’s sovereignty over all power. The chapter outlines the reign of King Ahaz, his failure to uphold the laws and statutes of God leading to the nation’s downfall, and the subsequent divine intervention to restore order. This outline provides an in-depth theological evaluation of the power as depicted in 2 Chronicles 28 and offers a cross-reference to other biblical texts for a comprehensive understanding.

I. 2 Chronicles 28:1-4: Ahaz’s Misuse of Power
Ahaz’s reign is characterized by his failure to do “what was right in the eyes of the LORD” (2 Chronicles 28:1). Instead, he chooses a path of idolatry, even sacrificing his own children in pagan rituals (2 Chronicles 28:3). This misuse of power can be compared to King Saul’s disobedience in 1 Samuel 15:22-23 and King Solomon’s idolatry in 1 Kings 11:4-6. All these instances illustrate the devastating consequences of power when it’s not aligned with God’s will.

II. 2 Chronicles 28:5-8: The Consequences of Ahaz’s Actions
The consequences of Ahaz’s disobedience are dire with the nation being handed over to their enemies (2 Chronicles 28:5-8). This narrative is reminiscent of Israel’s defeat in Judges 2:14-15 due to their disobedience and the fall of Jerusalem in 2 Kings 25:1-4 due to King Zedekiah’s rebellion against God. In both instances, the misuse of power leads to downfall, reinforcing the biblical premise that power should be exercised in submission to God’s will.

III. 2 Chronicles 28:9-15: Divine Intervention and a Call for Mercy
Despite Israel’s victory, God sends a prophet to rebuke them for their merciless treatment of their brethren (2 Chronicles 28:9-11). This highlights God’s mercy and justice, a theme echoed in Ezekiel 33:11 and Psalm 145:8-9. God’s intervention in this case demonstrates that His power extends beyond human power, underscoring His ultimate authority over all things.

IV. 2 Chronicles 28:16-21: Ahaz’s Desperation and Misguided Alliances
Ahaz, in his distress, reaches out to the Assyrians for help instead of turning to God (2 Chronicles 28:16). This is a stark contrast to King Jehoshaphat who sought God’s help in 2 Chronicles 20:3-4 when faced with similar circumstances. Ahaz’s misguided alliances further illustrate the pitfalls of relying on human power instead of divine power.

V. 2 Chronicles 28:22-27: Ahaz’s Continued Apostasy and Death
Despite the hardships, Ahaz continues in his idolatry, further spiraling into disobedience (2 Chronicles 28:22-25). His death, as described in 2 Chronicles 28:27, mirrors that of King Jeroboam in 2 Chronicles 13:20 and King Jehoram in 2 Chronicles 21:20, who also died without honor due to their rejection of God. Again, this reinforces the biblical concept of power: when not exercised in accordance with God’s commands, it leads to ruin.

Conclusion: 2 Chronicles 28 serves as a potent illustration of power and its potential consequences when misused. King Ahaz’s reign is a cautionary tale, emphasizing the importance of aligning power with God’s will. It reinforces the understanding that power, in its truest form, is not about domination or control, but about submission to God’s sovereignty. The chapter further highlights the significance of mercy, justice, humility, and reliance on God in the exercise of power. Indeed, through this narrative, it becomes evident that ultimate power resides not in mighty armies or political alliances, but in the hands of the Almighty God.

The Nicolaitans were a group mentioned in the book of Revelation in the New Testament, specifically in Revelation 2:6, 2:15. They were a heretical sect in the early Christian church that was condemned by Jesus in his messages to the churches of Ephesus and Pergamum. The exact beliefs and practices of the Nicolaitans are not clearly described in the Bible, but early church leaders such as Irenaeus and Clement of Alexandria suggested that they promoted sexual immorality and the consumption of food sacrificed to idols. Some scholars believe that the Nicolaitans were followers of a false teacher named Nicolas, who may have been one of the original seven deacons appointed by the apostles in Acts 6:5. However, the exact identity and teachings of the Nicolaitans remain a matter of debate among theologians and historians.