Smiths Outline Bible Project

Read or search the Bible (opens new tab)

Elihu Questions Job’s Righteousness in Job 35

Introduction: In Job 35  where Elihu continues his discourse, challenging Job and examining God’s justice. This chapter emphasizes the transcendence and righteousness of God, and questions Job’s understanding of righteousness and justice in relation to the Almighty. It provides a closer look at Elihu’s argument, revealing the profound depth of each verse. This theological analysis of Job 35 aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of the chapter’s significance, bridging the gap between Job’s suffering and God’s justice.

I. Job 35:1-3 Elihu Challenges Job’s righteousness

In these verses, Elihu questions Job’s understanding of righteousness and justice. He challenges Job’s assertion that his righteousness is more than God’s (Job 9:22-24). Elihu emphasizes that God’s righteousness transcends human understanding and questions whether Job’s righteousness benefits God or merely himself (Psalm 16:2). He also refers to Job’s complaint about not being rewarded for his righteousness (Job 9:17; 10:15), indicating that God’s justice operates beyond human comprehension (Isaiah 55:8-9).

II. Job 35:4-8 The Limitations of Human Righteousness

Here, Elihu elaborates on the limitations of human righteousness. He argues that human righteousness or wickedness does not affect God (Psalm 50:12-15). Instead, our righteousness benefits our fellow humans (Proverbs 14:34). This shows that God is unaffected by human actions and that His justice is perfect and incorruptible (Deuteronomy 32:4).

III. Job 35:9-12 The Cry of the Afflicted

Elihu affirms that often, people cry out under oppression but do not recognize God’s deliverance (Psalm 107:13-14). He suggests that God does not answer because of their pride (Proverbs 1:28-30). He emphasizes that God’s justice is not always immediate, but it is inevitable, and it is a testing ground for our faith (James 1:2-4).

IV. Job 35:13-16 God’s Transcendence and Justice

Finally, Elihu emphasizes God’s transcendence, arguing that God does not owe us an answer and that it is His prerogative to answer or remain silent (Romans 9:20-21). He reiterates that Job’s case is not unique; God’s silence doesn’t mean He is unjust (Psalm 83:1). Instead, it is a call for humility and trust in God’s justice (Psalm 37:5-6).

Conclusion: A thorough examination of Job 35 leads us to an understanding of God’s righteousness and justice. This chapter invites us to reflect on the limitations of our righteousness and the transcendence of God’s righteousness and justice. It teaches that any assertion of our righteousness before God is short-sighted, as our righteousness is beneficial to others more than God. It also emphasizes that while God may seem silent during our trials and tribulations, His justice transcends our comprehension, and His deliverance is inevitable. Ultimately, our faith and trust in God should not hinge on immediate answers but on His unfailing righteousness and justice. Job 35 reminds us to trust in God’s timing and justice, knowing that His plans are always for our good (Jeremiah 29:11). Thus, it encourages us to have faith in Him even in our darkest times, holding onto the hope of His righteousness and justice.

The Nicolaitans were a group mentioned in the book of Revelation in the New Testament, specifically in Revelation 2:6, 2:15. They were a heretical sect in the early Christian church that was condemned by Jesus in his messages to the churches of Ephesus and Pergamum. The exact beliefs and practices of the Nicolaitans are not clearly described in the Bible, but early church leaders such as Irenaeus and Clement of Alexandria suggested that they promoted sexual immorality and the consumption of food sacrificed to idols. Some scholars believe that the Nicolaitans were followers of a false teacher named Nicolas, who may have been one of the original seven deacons appointed by the apostles in Acts 6:5. However, the exact identity and teachings of the Nicolaitans remain a matter of debate among theologians and historians.